chore: 4.5x reduction in number of golden files#3399
Conversation
|
So |
Correct, However, the plan is for Note that the worst case scenario here is not missing any kind of correctness issue. This test suite does not run any queries. It just checks that the plan is expected. |
I'm prob not getting this. |
|
Alright, let's try a different approach. Let's generate golden files for the two scan implementations |
mbutrovich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maintaining two sets, one for each parquet scan, makes sense to me. Thanks @andygrove!
|
Thanks for the good feedback @kazuyukitanimura @comphead @mbutrovich |
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
native_datafusionandnative_iceberg_compatscans, droppingautoHow are these changes tested?