fix: largeUtf8 don't support is distinct from#5993
Merged
alamb merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Apr 14, 2023
Merged
Conversation
r4ntix
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2023
yjshen
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2023
Contributor
|
Thanks @jackwener @r4ntix and @yjshen ! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #5991.
Rationale for this change
After I fix
type coercionforlargeUtf8/utf8, I findlargeutf8 is distinct from largeutf8still fail.What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
add slt
Are there any user-facing changes?