Add --useReadOnlyType for TS#1205
Conversation
42d7787 to
43d2c08
Compare
|
OK – the upstream PR has been merged, and all tests pass. |
|
Bump. |
|
Hey, can somebody look at this? |
03cfe20 to
0c4d967
Compare
|
Just updated to fix merge conflicts. |
trevor-scheer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is awesome, thanks for the PR (and the persistence) @mike-marcacci! Apologies for the delays in getting around to this, we stay pretty busy around here 😉
Just a couple minor things, but overall this is looking good! In line with my comment about preserving the old flag, can we add a test case that still uses the old one?
|
Fun fact, if you update and see some funny business with the tests (azure 8 & 10 failing unexpectedly), feel free to ignore. Tests are a bit flaky for now, and a rerun usually resolves the problem. |
These are autogenerated, so these changes are unnecessary.
2b656de to
0c2ee77
Compare
0c2ee77 to
d124374
Compare
|
I've made the requested changes, but can no longer run ...so I can't build or run tests locally. I manually created the snapshot so that the new test passes when run on CircleCI so this PR should be good to go. (But you'll still probably want to try cloning a fresh copy of the repo to see if there's a more general problem.) |
|
Looks great! An Thanks again for the work on this, including the upstream types fix! |
|
Awesome - Thanks so much for the great review and snappy followup! |
|
Released in |
Please note that the checks currently fail due to a flaw in the type definitions for
babel-types, which is fixed in this PR. Once that lands, the tests will pass.