-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
[perflint] Fix comment duplication in fixes (PERF401, PERF403)
#23729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ntBre
merged 1 commit into
astral-sh:main
from
anishgirianish:fix/perf401-perf403-comment-duplication
Mar 6, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -422,11 +422,16 @@ fn convert_to_list_extend( | |
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| let variable_name = locator.slice(binding); | ||
| let for_loop_inline_comments = comment_strings_in_range( | ||
| checker, | ||
| for_stmt.range, | ||
| &[to_append.range(), for_stmt.iter.range()], | ||
| ); | ||
| let mut ranges_to_ignore = vec![ | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It's a bit sad to allocate a if let Some(test) = if_test {
&[to_append.range(), for_stmt.iter.range(), for_stmt.target.range(), test.range()]
} else {
&[to_append.range(), for_stmt.iter.range(), for_stmt.target.range()]
}Although now that I write that out, I don't mind it as much as I expected. |
||
| to_append.range(), | ||
| for_stmt.iter.range(), | ||
| for_stmt.target.range(), | ||
| ]; | ||
| if let Some(test) = if_test { | ||
| ranges_to_ignore.push(test.range()); | ||
| } | ||
| let for_loop_inline_comments = | ||
| comment_strings_in_range(checker, for_stmt.range, &ranges_to_ignore); | ||
|
|
||
| let newline = checker.stylist().line_ending().as_str(); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you have to change the code to handle this case as well as the one above? I ask because these look very similar to me, and I'm wondering if we can drop one of the tests, but if they exercise different parts of the code, it's fine to keep both.