Skip to content

docs: fix "it's" to "its" (possessive) in source comments#37428

Open
syukawa-gh wants to merge 1 commit intoaws:mainfrom
syukawa-gh:docs/fix-its-possessive
Open

docs: fix "it's" to "its" (possessive) in source comments#37428
syukawa-gh wants to merge 1 commit intoaws:mainfrom
syukawa-gh:docs/fix-its-possessive

Conversation

@syukawa-gh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reason for this change

Fix incorrect use of "it's" (contraction of "it is") where "its" (possessive) is intended.

Description of changes

  • aws-config: "from it's expected configuration" → "from its expected configuration"
  • aws-ecs-patterns: "it's corresponding DLQ" → "its corresponding DLQ"
  • core: "from it's `coname`" → "from its `coname`"
  • aws-glue-alpha: "from it's name" → "from its name"

Description of how you validated changes

Documentation-only change (source comments). No functional impact.

Checklist


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@syukawa-gh syukawa-gh requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2026 09:51
@github-actions github-actions bot added p2 admired-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 13-24 PRs to the CDK labels Mar 31, 2026
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team March 31, 2026 09:51
"it's" is a contraction of "it is" or "it has". The possessive
form of "it" is "its" (no apostrophe).
@syukawa-gh syukawa-gh force-pushed the docs/fix-its-possessive branch from afc580c to 69d3407 Compare March 31, 2026 09:53
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Mar 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

admired-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 13-24 PRs to the CDK p2 pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants