It is a common practice to report lidar measurements of vertical profiles and vertically integrated quantity in the same file. For example, the file will contain vertical profile of aerosol extinction and aerosol optical depth (AOD). For airborne sampling, the FeatureType for extinction profile is trajectoryProfile. The AOD is timeSeriesProfile. Sample files can be found at: https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/cpex.2022#NEHRIR.AMIN/. This practice appears inconsistent with the recent version of the CF convention: "When using these new conventions, the features contained within a collection must always be of the same type; and all the collections in a CF file must be of the same feature type." However, this type of files is convenient for the researchers in the subject area, Could someone to clarify how multiple FeatureTypes in a CF file would cause problems? Or maybe this is not a correct interpretation of the CF conventions?
It is a common practice to report lidar measurements of vertical profiles and vertically integrated quantity in the same file. For example, the file will contain vertical profile of aerosol extinction and aerosol optical depth (AOD). For airborne sampling, the FeatureType for extinction profile is trajectoryProfile. The AOD is timeSeriesProfile. Sample files can be found at: https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/cpex.2022#NEHRIR.AMIN/. This practice appears inconsistent with the recent version of the CF convention: "When using these new conventions, the features contained within a collection must always be of the same type; and all the collections in a CF file must be of the same feature type." However, this type of files is convenient for the researchers in the subject area, Could someone to clarify how multiple FeatureTypes in a CF file would cause problems? Or maybe this is not a correct interpretation of the CF conventions?