@japamment @eileenhertwig-dkrz
I had emailed about this, but have some suspicion that maybe my email was not seen or likely blocked due to having xml/code in it. I'm going to copy/repeat that here so that email filters are hopefully not an issue:
The build failure of the vocabularies repo is due to the standard name xml 93 not having a reference to the stylesheet, the following line needs to be added after the initial declaration:
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://cfconventions.org/vocabularies/stylesheets/cf-standard-name-table-1.4.xsl" ?>
See for example line 2 of standard name table 92:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cf-convention/vocabularies/refs/heads/main/docs/cf-standard-names/version/92/cf-standard-name-table.xml
While the fix is small, I don't think I've yet to see a successful build of the vocabularies repo by someone other than myself and I'm keen on seeing that happen, as such, I will hold off on opening a pr/committing.
@japamment @eileenhertwig-dkrz
I had emailed about this, but have some suspicion that maybe my email was not seen or likely blocked due to having xml/code in it. I'm going to copy/repeat that here so that email filters are hopefully not an issue:
The build failure of the vocabularies repo is due to the standard name xml 93 not having a reference to the stylesheet, the following line needs to be added after the initial declaration:
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://cfconventions.org/vocabularies/stylesheets/cf-standard-name-table-1.4.xsl" ?>See for example line 2 of standard name table 92:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cf-convention/vocabularies/refs/heads/main/docs/cf-standard-names/version/92/cf-standard-name-table.xml
While the fix is small, I don't think I've yet to see a successful build of the vocabularies repo by someone other than myself and I'm keen on seeing that happen, as such, I will hold off on opening a pr/committing.