Skip to content

feat(mempool): priority nonce mempool option with tx replacement#14484

Merged
julienrbrt merged 12 commits into
cosmos:mainfrom
JayT106:mempool_tx_replacement_option
Jan 10, 2023
Merged

feat(mempool): priority nonce mempool option with tx replacement#14484
julienrbrt merged 12 commits into
cosmos:mainfrom
JayT106:mempool_tx_replacement_option

Conversation

@JayT106

@JayT106 JayT106 commented Jan 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Add a mempool option for app setup of the tx replacement rule based on tx priority comparing logic. The current implementation is always allowing the transaction to be replaced when the mempool has a transaction with the same sender and the nonce.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@JayT106 JayT106 requested a review from a team January 4, 2023 20:45
@JayT106 JayT106 changed the title feat: priority nonce mempool option with tx replacement feat(mempool): priority nonce mempool option with tx replacement Jan 4, 2023
Comment thread types/mempool/priority_nonce.go Outdated
@kocubinski kocubinski self-assigned this Jan 5, 2023
Comment thread types/mempool/priority_nonce.go Outdated
@kocubinski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So the intent here is to disallow tx replacement by [sender, nonce] by an arbitrary rule defined by the user of the mempool?

Comment thread types/mempool/priority_nonce.go Outdated
@JayT106

JayT106 commented Jan 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

So the intent here is to disallow tx replacement by [sender, nonce] by an arbitrary rule defined by the user of the mempool?

Correct, the application can setup a rule to replace the transaction when the transaction has the same sender&nonce instead of always being replaced.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

Can we add a changelog?

@JayT106

JayT106 commented Jan 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

lgtm!

Can we add a changelog?

done!

@julienrbrt julienrbrt merged commit e6b849a into cosmos:main Jan 10, 2023
0xbala-k pushed a commit to 0xbala-k/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2023
@alexanderbez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Mergifyio backport release/v0.47.x

@mergify

mergify Bot commented Feb 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

backport release/v0.47.x

✅ Backports have been created

Details

mergify Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2023
)

Co-authored-by: Matt Kocubinski <mkocubinski@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e6b849a)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
alexanderbez pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2023
…kport #14484) (#15126)

Co-authored-by: JayT106 <JayT106@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants