Conversation
b00fed4 to
db6e6af
Compare
|
bors: r+ |
|
Build failed: |
|
bors retry |
|
Build failed: |
|
@rbtcollins, |
|
just a small nitpick, should this be backported into https://github.com/rust-embedded/cross/tree/v0.2.1 ? |
|
Hmmmm, will look into that. Internally the two are basically aliases. |
|
What's the status on this? @rbtcollins |
|
We added the flag to rustup, and its in a deprecation period where it isn't required. I encourage merging the use of the flag, so that we can move forward with making it required. There is a UI glitch associated with it triggering unnecessarily in some cases on Windows, but we should get that fixed for the next release I hope |
|
bors retry |
|
Build failed: |
|
It looks like this is failing on MacOS and Windows builds with: i.e., related to adding |
@rbtcollins, |
|
rust-lang/rustup#2968 has been merged, not sure when next release is |
|
As rustup has support for it, are this going in 0.2.2? |
this issue is blocked on new rustup release, it can't be included without upstream support |
We need to wait for a release that supports it, because $ rustup toolchain install 1.58.0 --force-non-host
error: Found argument '--force-non-host' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context
Did you mean --force?
USAGE:
rustup toolchain install <toolchain>... --force
For more information try --help
$ rustup -V
rustup 1.24.3 (ce5817a94 2021-05-31)
info: This is the version for the rustup toolchain manager, not the rustc compiler.
info: The currently active `rustc` version is `rustc 1.61.0 (fe5b13d68 2022-05-18)So we need to wait for a later release, but yes, if this is done prior to our |
|
We could check for 1.24.4 as it has been merged already. |
Alexhuszagh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok it seems like rustup doesn't have different branches, so it's safe to assume this will be in 1.24.4. @Emilgardis look good?
|
I accidentally rebased it off the wrong branch, I've since fixed it. @reitermarkus can you squash the commits down to a single one and we can merge it? |
|
rustup 1.25.0 has been released, containing the fix |
|
We should probably merge this quickly then. |
e4acb50 to
fad7b5c
Compare
fad7b5c to
107b5e9
Compare
Co-authored-by: Markus Reiter <me@reitermark.us>
d780f1b to
3665634
Compare
|
Build succeeded: |
Closes #536.