Skip to content

chore: remove maintenance skills from .claude/ and .agents/ (moved to deepgram/agents)#46

Merged
lukeocodes merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
lo/remove-maintenance-skills
May 1, 2026
Merged

chore: remove maintenance skills from .claude/ and .agents/ (moved to deepgram/agents)#46
lukeocodes merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
lo/remove-maintenance-skills

Conversation

@lukeocodes

@lukeocodes lukeocodes commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Removes maintenance-flavored skills targeted at the SDK team, not at SDK users:

  • .claude/skills/prepare-regen.md
  • .claude/skills/review-regen.md
  • .agents/skills/deepgram-java-maintaining-sdk/ (duplicated AGENTS.md content; its own footer admitted so)

These have been generalized and consolidated into the internal deepgram/agents repo so the SDK team installs them once and gets them across every Deepgram SDK we maintain (Python, JS, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust, .NET, Swift).

What's not changing

  • AGENTS.md in this repo is unchanged. It remains the SDK-specific source of truth for the frozen-file list, validation command, and any language-specific maintainer notes.
  • The user-facing skills under .agents/skills/ (deepgram-java-speech-to-text, deepgram-java-voice-agent, etc.) are untouched. Those are for SDK consumers and stay where they are.
  • The Fern regen workflow itself is unchanged. Just the workflow guidance moves to the internal install.

After this lands

The canonical maintenance reference is now deepgram/agents (workflow) + this repo's AGENTS.md (specifics). No information is lost — AGENTS.md has the full per-repo detail.

SDK-team members install the new skills via deepgram/agents and run the regen workflow exactly as before. Triggers like "fern regen" / "freeze classification" / "prepare regen" / "review regen" continue to work; they're now driven by the generalized skills in deepgram/agents.

…gents) [no-ci]

prepare-regen and review-regen are SDK-team workflow skills targeted
at us, not at SDK users. They've been generalized and consolidated
into the internal deepgram/agents repo (PR #16) where the SDK team
installs them once and gets them across every SDK they touch.

This SDK's user-facing skills (under .agents/skills/ if present) are
unchanged -- those are for SDK consumers and stay where they are.

See: deepgram/agents#16
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 29, 2026 11:32

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Removes internal SDK-team Claude workflow “skills” from this repository now that they’ve been consolidated into the internal deepgram/agents repo, keeping only the user-facing skills under .agents/skills/.

Changes:

  • Delete .claude/skills/prepare-regen.md (regen preparation workflow guidance).
  • Delete .claude/skills/review-regen.md (post-regen review/re-apply patches workflow guidance).

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
.claude/skills/prepare-regen.md Removed internal-only regen preparation guidance now maintained in deepgram/agents.
.claude/skills/review-regen.md Removed internal-only regen review guidance now maintained in deepgram/agents.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@lukeocodes lukeocodes requested a review from GregHolmes April 29, 2026 11:39
This was a duplicate of AGENTS.md content (its own footer admitted so)
and is internal-facing. The maintenance workflow lives in deepgram/agents
PR #16 now; AGENTS.md in this repo remains as the SDK-specific source
of truth for frozen file lists and validation commands.
@lukeocodes lukeocodes changed the title chore: remove .claude/ maintenance skills (moved to deepgram/agents) chore: remove maintenance skills from .claude/ and .agents/ (moved to deepgram/agents) Apr 29, 2026
@lukeocodes lukeocodes merged commit bb69012 into main May 1, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants