feat: expose spectrum Flex component as wrapped deephaven component#1869
Merged
feat: expose spectrum Flex component as wrapped deephaven component#1869
Flex component as wrapped deephaven component#1869Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1869 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 46.11% 46.11%
=======================================
Files 636 636
Lines 38070 38070
Branches 9627 9627
=======================================
Hits 17556 17556
Misses 20461 20461
Partials 53 53
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
mofojed
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Simple wrapping of the flex component.
I don't see anything we need to custiomize, so just re-export it I guess.