Housekeeping#3714
Conversation
|
Wow, this looks really great! Thanks for taking the time to help clean up this stuff! :) @MrZyx This looks good to merge; if you have no objections I'd be happy to merge this in ASAP. |
|
Personally, I'd prefer if we do the 0.0.2 first, and then continue the cleanup spree ;) |
|
This looks awesome but also should probably live in development branch for a while to notice any problems? So tend to agree with @Raven24 on this. Although I think 0.0.2 really should be 0.1.0 - it's certainly got enough stuff for a minor increment. Very far from a patch, let's not be too conservative with version numbers .. that doesn't make the project look good or attractive either. |
|
0.0.2.0 is a minor release, 0.1.0.0 would be major. I agree on having this for 0.0.3.0 |
|
@MrZyx actually no, x.y.z according to semver: X = major |
|
Reread the proposal you agreed to. |
|
AFAIK, our SemVer implementation uses release.major.minor.hotfix. I'm personally fine with that for now. Sure, our version number looks small now, but it'll move along as more helping hands join in. |
|
I add this to my pod to keep trying. Thanks fabianrbz |
|
Thank you Fabian great job ;) |
|
So lets see what breaks :P |
In this PR I removed a lot of views, templates and helpers that from what I've seen aren't used -as far as I've found looking into the code and some help from git grep -.