{lib}[GCCcore/10.3.0] Mesa v21.1.1, LLVM v11.1.0, Mako v1.1.4, ... w/ Python 3.9.5

[boegel]

(created using eb --new-pr)
requires #12939 (X11)

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
node3546.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8ec393a42ad6e99f9bb6e0011ff68f18 for a full test report.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12943 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12943 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 17301

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 847268139 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[Micket]

Do we consider holding back the LLVM version a bit for better compatibility with e.g. numba (I don't see that we use LLVM for anything else really)

[boegel]

Do we consider holding back the LLVM version a bit for better compatibility with e.g. numba (I don't see that we use LLVM for anything else really)

We would need to use LLVM 10.x then (or even 9.x on aarch64, cfr. https://github.com/numba/llvmlite#compatibility), which is a downgrade compared to 2020b...

Someone in Slack was recently looking into statically linking LLVM into llvmlite, which seems like a more promising approach since that makes LLVM just a build dependency for llvmlite+numba?

[boegel]

It looks like @fizwit got numba to work on top of LLVM 11.0.1 though, see https://github.com/FredHutch/easybuild-life-sciences/blob/master/fh_easyconfigs/n/numba/numba-0.53.1-fosscuda-2020b.eb ...

[fizwit]

It builds and passes sanity, could use more testing

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:22 PM Kenneth Hoste ***@***.***> wrote: It looks like @fizwit <https://github.com/fizwit> got numba to work on top of LLVM 11.0.1 though, see https://github.com/FredHutch/easybuild-life-sciences/blob/master/fh_easyconfigs/n/numba/numba-0.53.1-fosscuda-2020b.eb ... — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12943 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHC3S66TA57AQJQPWVBFJTTPKRNTANCNFSM45NS6INA> .

-- John Dey ***@***.***

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild2.novalocal - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, POWER, IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) (power9le), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/edf33f2740ee5a4d0c13ff8a6c02638f for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
select-pika-c6gd-2xlarge-0001 - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (graviton2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/a71dfd1ff4bbdfc01143f768cc46c999 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Note that using LLVM 11.1.0 here is (deliberately) conservative, since LLVM 12.0.0 is available already too...

@fizwit Did you run any test suites for llvmlite + numba on top of LLVM 11.x?
It seems like the patch may not be enough, based on the feedback in numba/llvmlite#639 ...
(see also numba/llvmlite#715)

[Micket]

I should mention that llvmlite has a tracking issue for llvm 12 support already as well, so maybe they plan to skip 11

[fizwit]

More testing is needed

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:31 AM Kenneth Hoste ***@***.***> wrote: Note that using LLVM 11.1.0 here is (deliberately) conservative, since LLVM 12.0.0 is available already too... @fizwit <https://github.com/fizwit> Did you run any test suites for llvmlite + numba on top of LLVM 11.x? It seems like the patch may not be enough, based on the feedback in numba/llvmlite#639 <numba/llvmlite#639> ... — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12943 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHC3S4LKOH3GBVNYUAIHG3TPOYFHANCNFSM45NS6INA> .

-- John Dey ***@***.***

[verdurin]

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (6 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/265b831fd2ffd3577636368bd2d73db6 for a full test report.

[verdurin]

Looks fine.

[verdurin]

Going in, thanks @boegel!