{bio}[fosscuda/2019b] RoseTTAFold v1.0.0 w/ Python 3.7.4#13795
{bio}[fosscuda/2019b] RoseTTAFold v1.0.0 w/ Python 3.7.4#13795zemu-csi wants to merge 21 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Conversation
…orch-1.8.1.eb and patches: RoseTTAFold-1.0.0_cpu_mem_from_env.patch, RoseTTAFold-1.0.0_db_paths_from_env.patch, RoseTTAFold-1.0.0_fix_cache_directory.patch, RoseTTAFold-1.0.0_lddt_path.patch, RoseTTAFold-1.0.0_no_conda.patch, RoseTTAFold-1.0.0_use_eb_paths.patch
|
I'm not sure if there is anything we could add as sanity check. Maybe something like #!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --job-name=RoseTTAFold
#SBATCH --output=rosettafold-job-out.%J
#SBATCH --time=48:00:00
#SBATCH --nodes=1
#SBATCH --cpus-per-task=16
#SBATCH --gres=gpu:rtx2080ti:1
module load RoseTTAFold/1.0.0-fosscuda-2019b-Python-3.7.4-PyTorch-1.8.1
export BFDPATH=/scratch/pdbs/bfd
export PDB100PATH=/scratch/pdbs/pdb100_2021Mar03
export UNIREF30PATH=/scratch/pdbs/UniRef30_2020_06
export MEM=$SLURM_MEM_PER_NODE
export CPU=$SLURM_CPUS_PER_TASK
run_pyrosetta_ver.sh input.fa $PWD |
|
Test report by @zemu-unile |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 922869452 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso
Failed with |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 923717491 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
Failed because generoso has no sources for |
|
@zemu-unile Could you change the HH-Suite dependency from |
|
One problem here is that HH-Suite 3.3.0 is in 2020 toolchains but RoseTTAFold needs 2019b due to requiring old TensorFlow 1.x. I am not sure if we should port HH-Suite 3.3.0 to 2019b. @Micket any thoughts on this? |
|
Good point, however I don't see any issue having an EC for 3.2.0 and 3.3.0 in 2019b. But you are right, the proper way would be to patch 3.2.0 to make it work. |
We would need to add an exception for the CI to allow multiple version in the same toolchain. But yes that is possible. |
|
The Problem with TensorFlow 1.x is that it needs an older Cuda version. I'm still hoping that RoseTTAFold will switch to TensorFlow 2.x |
Good point! Okay, then I suggest to add HH-Suite 3.3.0 to 2019b with an exception. Do you agree? |
|
Opened a PR for HH-Suite #14191 |
…asyconfigs into 20210823110414_new_pr_RoseTTAFold100
|
closing this since |
(created using
eb --new-pr)