{tools}[foss/2021b] OpenAI-Gym v0.21.0 w/ Python 3.9.6

[lexming]

(created using eb --new-pr)

Depends on:

• {tools}[foss/2021b] Arcade-Learning-Environment v0.7.3 w/ Python 3.9.6 #14753
• {lib,phys}[GCCcore/11.2.0,foss/2021b] GLFW v3.3.4, MuJoCo v2.1.1, mujoco-py v2.1.2.14 w/ Python 3.9.6 #14776
• {vis}[foss/2021b] OpenCV v4.5.5 w/ Python 3.9.6 #14774
• fix location of lock file in mujoco-py v2.1.2.14 #14965

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3119.skitty.os - Linux UNKNOWN UNKNOWN, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/67a5c88672cdfc3194533b335d3e40fa for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3523.doduo.os - Linux UNKNOWN UNKNOWN, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/d33d99f6019ebc7d4d65de8f42aeae1b for a full test report.

[boegel]

@lexming Failed test report is with read-only install dir configuration, the import check tries to change something in the installation?!

[lexming]

soooo... mujoco-py tries to create a lock in the library directory of MuJoCo /facepalm

https://github.com/openai/mujoco-py/blob/f1312cceeeebbba17e78d5d77fbffa091eed9a3a/mujoco_py/builder.py#L89-L92

There are already open issues about it at openai/mujoco-py#424 and openai/mujoco-py#533

I'll make a patch to use a temp dir instead

[lexming]

@boegel should be fixed in #14965

[migueldiascosta]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14779 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14779 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 8112

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1034535489 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/96a73fe940b569bf0e2c39b75c70f6fc for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3120.skitty.os - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/a9c7528375956f853b7557c407e37a6a for a full test report.

[boegel]

lgtm

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3623.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/81c303c8e89231ffaaf5d3d82fd8dd7a for a full test report.

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @lexming!