{cae}[foss/2022a] OpenFOAM v10

[kosl]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[kosl]

Requires easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2766 to be merged

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2766"
CORE_CNT=16

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16259 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2766" /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16259 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 9168

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1252334427 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2766
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b61256aa0452842e0d4fb555281f9c30 for a full test report.

[mboisson]

@kosl, didn't you encounter this ? #15907

[mboisson]

Also, OpenFOAM should not require foss, gompi is enough, nothing in its dependences or itself uses BLAS or FFTW as far as I know

[kosl]

@kosl, didn't you encounter this ? #15907
I have tried

ml OpenFOAM/10-foss-2022a
ompi_info | grep -i thread
          Thread support: posix (MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE: yes, OPAL support: yes, OMPI progress: no, ORTE progress: yes, Event lib: yes)

source $FOAM_BASH
cp -a $FOAM_TUTORIALS openfoam-tutorials
./Allclean
./Allrun
grep ERROR log.*
paraFoam

I am getting correct results in my opinion and no problems in log.snappyHexMesh with runParallel snappyHexMesh -overwrite

Will rename to gompi toolchain.

[satishskamath]

@kosl Any updates on this PR?

[smoors]

Also, OpenFOAM should not require foss, gompi is enough, nothing in its dependences or itself uses BLAS or FFTW as far as I know

ParaView dependency is built with foss, so OpenFOAM should be built with foss too

[satishskamath]

@kosl: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/actions/runs/3787873366 Output from first failing test suite run:

FAIL: test_pr_sha256_checksums (test.easyconfigs.easyconfigs.EasyConfigTest)
Make sure changed easyconfigs have SHA256 checksums in place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test/easyconfigs/easyconfigs.py", line 955, in test_pr_sha256_checksums
    self.assertTrue(len(checksum_issues) == 0, "No checksum issues:\n%s" % '\n'.join(checksum_issues))
AssertionError: No checksum issues:
Checksums missing for one or more sources/patches in OpenFOAM-10-foss-2022a.eb: found 1 sources + 1 patches vs 3 checksums

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 16073 tests in 896.759s

FAILED (failures=1)
ERROR: Not all tests were successful

bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01) Please talk to my owner @boegel if you notice you me acting stupid), or submit a pull request to https://github.com/boegel/boegelbot fix the problem.

How come there are checksum errors? I tried it locally and it worked. @smoors

[smoors]

How come there are checksum errors? I tried it locally and it worked. @smoors

there is only 1 patch listed, but there are 3 checksums (1 for source, 2 for patches)

[satishskamath]

How come there are checksum errors? I tried it locally and it worked. @smoors

there is only 1 patch listed, but there are 3 checksums (1 for source, 2 for patches)

The # OpenFOAM-v1906-wmake-ompi.patch is not required.
@smoors or @boegel Can you make this change in the eb file?

[boegel]

How come there are checksum errors? I tried it locally and it worked. @smoors

there is only 1 patch listed, but there are 3 checksums (1 for source, 2 for patches)

The # OpenFOAM-v1906-wmake-ompi.patch is not required. @smoors or @boegel Can you make this change in the eb file?

yes, done in 3c671c2

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3130.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/91728d121230b655d777a1394fb6fe55 for a full test report.

[boegel]

lgtm

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @kosl!

[mboisson]

Also, OpenFOAM should not require foss, gompi is enough, nothing in its dependences or itself uses BLAS or FFTW as far as I know

ParaView dependency is built with foss, so OpenFOAM should be built with foss too

ParaView does not require foss either, it does not need MKL/FFTW
https://github.com/ComputeCanada/easybuild-easyconfigs-installed-avx2/blob/main/2020/ParaView/ParaView-5.10.0-gompi-2020a.eb