further relax jax linalg_test test tolerance

[surak]

This test gives a slightly higher number while installing on Juwels booster.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17095 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17095 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 10029

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1387280764 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegel]

Patch seems to need work, doesn't apply for jax-0.3.14-foss-2022a-CUDA-11.7.0.eb for example.

Full test report coming up...

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/5728897a649816ccb1f8c7f55439089e for a full test report.

[branfosj]

Patch seems to need work, doesn't apply for jax-0.3.14-foss-2022a-CUDA-11.7.0.eb for example.

Full test report coming up...

The new part of the patch only applies in the latest Jax easyconfigs. So, jax-0.3.9_relax-test-tolerance.patch should be reverted to the original content and a new patch added to relax the tolerance in the failing test for 0.3.23.

[boegel]

Hasn't been touched in quite a while, unlikely to still be relevant, so closing as is...