fix configure step for ELSI 2.5.0+ (and add missing foss versions)

[Flamefire]

(created using eb --new-pr)

fixes #17259

[Flamefire]

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
taurusi6607.taurus.hrsk.tu-dresden.de - Linux RHEL 7.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (haswell), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/c6408759d6854d0bd84c3ea38d5e0707 for a full test report.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17288 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17288 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 10137

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1424876569 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 6 out of 9 (8 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/7c61c609566976be767fd69f6a62ac60 for a full test report.

[Flamefire]

@boegel I see the same (or similar, not sure) errors during the tests so I disabled testing for my reports as the build is what was broken and manual investigation shows the correct compilers were used as far as I could tell.

[Micket]

Going through everything marked for 4.7.2

Two of the 2019b failures comes from missing MUMPS module, which, i'm really not sure what happened. Something must be broken in the module tree on generoso, or someone was rebuilding those ancient MUMPS packages at the same time, which seems unlikely. The last failure is the PEXSI variant which had a lot of segfaults.

2019b is to old for my own test tree, and I really don't think we want to hold back on the fixes for the more recent easyconfigs as a result of those old broken ones, which almost certainly were broken before this PR as far as i can tell.
I'm willing to accept this PR as is.

[Micket]

Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (2 easyconfigs in total)
vera-c1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.6, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/b3087679e1877f0a5b0a2387003aa4a1 for a full test report.

[Micket]

Going in, thanks @Flamefire!