{compiler,tools}[GCCcore/12.3.0] Clang v16.0.6, Z3 v4.12.2#18509
{compiler,tools}[GCCcore/12.3.0] Clang v16.0.6, Z3 v4.12.2#18509casparvl merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Conversation
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 1671332810 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2 |
|
@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 1671606181 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @casparvl |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Test report by @SebastianAchilles |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
I think my failure comes from a From the EasyBuild log (note, this was a different Clang version I was trying to build, but it ran into the same error and I didn't have the logs/build dir for the Clang in this PR anymore): From https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73679415/build-llvm-16-master-fail-on-libunwind it seems it might be related to the failing configure tests for e.g. Well, that wasn't a failure at all, it just was a warning! Still, the configure seems to conclude this is a failure (?). I'll try rerunning the build for this PR without Question: this flag is set for GCC. Since here, Clang is being build with Clang, should that receive the GCC optarch? I think we've had some discussion on this before. The tricky part is: it's not trivial that all GCC flags are understood by Clang. At the same time: Clang is not a toolchain, so can we even set an optarch for this...? |
|
Test report by @casparvl |
|
Well, at least without the Now succeeds just fine. The new error is now in the sanity check: |
|
Interesting, for me the The only thing that tends to be different for us than for others is that we build with |
|
Ah, same issue as #18551 |
|
Test report by @casparvl |
|
Going in, thanks @boegel! |
(created using
eb --new-pr)Needs: easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2929