{tools}[GCCcore/14.2.0] EasyErgo v1.0.1 w/ EasyBuild 5.1.0

[Micket]

(created using eb --new-pr)

Decided to add a versionsuffix as we would typically need to update this whenever the new EB release is out.

Also dropped to using easybuild-framework and easybuild-easyblocks in the pyproject.toml so that i don't have to worry about that easybuild pip check.

[Micket]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

[boegelbot]

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=23009 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_23009 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 6590

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2934414380 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/a92cd1e56a33161b68e1aeab9c6efcea for a full test report.

[Micket]

Test report by @Micket
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
vera-icelake-build - Linux Rocky Linux 9.2, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4316 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/45edf65a80c71648193e8aa25ace2e39 for a full test report.

[Micket]

Hrm.. i dropped to just using easybuild-easyblocks and easybuild-framework as dependencies, but when i build this i still hit

== FAILED: Installation ended unsuccessfully: `/apps/Arch/software/Python/3.13.1-GCCcore-14.2.0/bin/python -m pip check` failed:
easyergo 1.0.1 requires easybuild-easyblocks, which is not installed.
easyergo 1.0.1 requires easybuild-framework, which is not installed.

I have no idea how the bot succeeded at jsc-zen3...

[Micket]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

[boegelbot]

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=23009 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_23009 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 6592

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2934968120 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/e4c5cc0e5ab4824f4ea1c074891d2c9e for a full test report.

[jfgrimm]

@Micket I don't think the bot loads an EasyBuild/XYZ module when building PRs
Perhaps that's the difference?

edit: looks like that's indeed the cause. I also fail the sanity check if I build with my EasyBuild/5.1.0 module loaded, but if I don't load it and instead manually set PATH and PYTHONPATH, then it passes

[Micket]

So, it's EB module being clever and unloading itself for the build. Not sure how i can work around that.

on a side note, I wanted to add this as an option, anyone curious about using this can just install it into a venv of course.

I'm tempted to maybe switch my EB installs into just a uv venv where I can just include all extras EB likes; rich, pycodestyle, keyrings, easyergo and such.

[Micket]

I'm just going with the UV approach for this in my instructions.

[jfgrimm]

Makes sense, it's certainly easier than trying to get this PR to work cleanly