Fix contradiction in the README.md

[dmtrKovalenko]

Summary

Fix docs typo

Test Plan

–

[codesandbox-ci]

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit d84dddc:

Sandbox	Source
React	Configuration

[sizebot]

No significant bundle size changes to report.

Size changes (stable)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against d84dddc

[sizebot]

No significant bundle size changes to report.

Size changes (experimental)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against d84dddc

[bvaughn]

the backend must not be activated until after the frontend has been initialized

Can you elaborate on why you think this was a contradiction? I kind of thing the previous wording was a little clearer.

[dmtrKovalenko]

@bvaughn sorry for the long response.

Personally, I (as not a native speaker) found this confusing because the phrase until after is not using rarely and I googled this briefly and thought that it was a typo. But after some more deep googling I found that it means until the end of some period.

! No matter the meaning it is still a little bit confusing because the phrase has been initialized means the moment in the past when frontend was actually initialized – so we can use only until there. As far I understand after reading English forums the proper use of until after here would be "the backend must not be active until after frontend initialization" .

Anyway, feel free to close this issue. I am not a native speaker – so probably I don't understand everything, but this potentially can confuse somebody as well. (or not) :)

[bvaughn]

Thank you for elaborating.

I think the change in wording in this PR actually makes the README slightly less clear (from a native speaker's perspective) but maybe there is another change that could help both. What about?

The frontend and backend can be initialized in any order, but the backend must not be activated until the frontend initialization has completed. Because of this, the simplest sequence is:

[dmtrKovalenko]

I am not sure about this frontend has been initialization. I think this will be more simple and clear

-The frontend and backend can be initialized in any order, but the backend must not be activated until the frontend has been initialization has completed. Because of this, the simplest sequence is:
+ The frontend and backend can be initialized in any order, but the backend must not be activated until the frontend initialization has been completed. Because of this, the simplest sequence is:

[bvaughn]

Gah, I forgot to delete a "has been" in my previous suggestion. Sorry!

[bvaughn]

If you think this is clearer for non-native speaker, then I don't object. I think it's as clear for native speakers. 👍