While working on generating context documentation from schemas I noticed that the fdc3.message type defines an fdc3.entity.fileAttachment type inline:
|
"const": "fdc3.entity.fileAttachment" |
and the type name does not agree with that used in the example (fdc3.fileAttachment):
|
"type": "fdc3.fileAttachment", |
FDC3 context types should each have their own definition and schema to make them usable and to properly reserve the type name. Hence, this definition should be separated out into its own schema and be referenced into fdc3.message.
@Yannick-Malins & @mistryvinay
While working on generating context documentation from schemas I noticed that the
fdc3.messagetype defines anfdc3.entity.fileAttachmenttype inline:FDC3/schemas/context/message.schema.json
Line 46 in fdf060f
and the type name does not agree with that used in the example (
fdc3.fileAttachment):FDC3/schemas/context/message.schema.json
Line 89 in fdf060f
FDC3 context types should each have their own definition and schema to make them usable and to properly reserve the type name. Hence, this definition should be separated out into its own schema and be referenced into fdc3.message.
@Yannick-Malins & @mistryvinay