You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.
FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.
Agenda
Convene & roll call, review meeting notices (5mins)
Objection to proceeding from one meeting attendee relates to whether the issue falls under the FDC3 Charter
opinions expressed for the issue being relevant to the charter (5 participants / firms)
opinions against for the issue being relevant to the charter (1 participant / firm).
Meeting attendees:
expressed the opinion that allowing actions associated with notifications to issue communications to other apps, or raiseIntents for them to be resolved puts this issue within the scope of the charter
expressed the opinion that Notifications are core to many user workflows (including between applications and platforms) and hence they warrant standardisation
reported that support for standardized notifications API and ability to route those notificaitons into a container was a feature regularly requested by their customers and that the lack of a standardized, cross platform API for doing so made it difficult for them to fulfill that request.
pointed out that the 3 commercial container vendors all support a notificaiton API and UI, with differing APIs (which also differ from the web standard), indicating that this issue does need standardisation
It was further discussed that standardisation could be handled via:
Additions to the Desktop Agent API (implementation would then be the province of the Desktop Agent provider)
A standardized intent and context standard (The intent could then be handled by applications registered as supporting that intent)
A hybrid approach, where a specific Desktop Agent API is used to submit notifications, but additional functions are also provided for subscribing to the notification data)
Consensus achieved that further discussion of this issue is warranted and that specific proposals should be raised for consideration.
Please comment on the issue in Github and/or raise proposals for further discussion - once there is further activity on the issue it can be brought back to a future meeting
Clarified that this issue does not relate to 'windowing' or 'window management' but rather to the communication of application state, encoded as an FDC3 Context, to a Desktop Agent to be included in a saved workspace or layout.
Two meeting attendees indicated that their firms have done work in this area, had encountered problems implementing support for it using existing FDC3 concepts (e.g. Channels, which do not identify the source of context broadcasts) and would support further work on the topic
One meeting attendee pointed out that even if the technical issues are solved, transmission of state information will still be a proprietary or unstandardized use of FDC3 for a common feature of a desktop container - indicating that some form of standardisation is warranted
One meeting attendee objected to the idea of standardization
But was willing to reduce or withdraw that objection is this was recorded as an optional part of the standard (not required for compliance, but with a convention defined in the standard record that MAY be provided by an implementation).
One meeting attendee indicated that the technical issue are perhaps relevant to discussions at the Channels, Feeds & Transactions discussion group on the topic of 'feeds' or 'transactions' as these concepts have the potential to solve some of the issues
Date
Thursday 28 Oct 2021 - 10am EST / 3pm GMT
WebEx info
Meeting number: 665 568 411
More ways to join
Meeting notices
FINOS Project leads are responsible for observing the FINOS guidelines for running project meetings. Project maintainers can find additional resources in the FINOS Maintainers Cheatsheet.
All participants in FINOS project meetings are subject to the LF Antitrust Policy, the FINOS Community Code of Conduct and all other FINOS policies.
FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.
FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.
Agenda
fdc3.general.app.manifestmanifest type describing an application #314Minutes
Create an **implementations** section in the FDC3 website #466
Support the production of Desktop Agent Bridging #453
Provide Notification API's #387
Add save and restore state API calls - so FDC3 apps can fully participate in save and restore layout #386
Decisions Made
Action Items
Untracked attendees