[Paid Development] Product Life Management PLM

[Rgottsch1]

I'd like to sponsor Product Life Management PLM is used to maintain BoM revisions and track product lifecycle based on Engineering Change orders. Basically PLM application that allows us to :

– PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) helps to create ECO (Engineering Change Orders) to :

1. Make Part and BoM revisions.

2. Make MO Route revisions.

3. Update Work Operation based on revisions in BoM.

4. Generate alerts for changes in BoM’s as well as Routes in MO.

5. Generate multi-level approvals from higher authorities for any revision (BoM or Route) before making changes in MO

– Approve Engineering Change Orders

– Manage BoM Versions

[YogiYang]

If you are not hell bent to getting this done by ERPNext company then I would advise you to look at: https://erpnext.org/service-providers

Here you will find many registered developers who would take up the job.

[Rgottsch1]

I’m new to this processs. Where I posted on Github is for ERPNext company only? If I am ok with services by others it gets posted on erpnext-jobs post listed below? Would ERPNext be willing to work on the project if it was sponsored? Rob Gottschalk [Part 2.2] GEM Manufacturing, Inc. p: 262-857-7274 x 217 | f: 262-857-2917 From: YogiYang [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:40 AM To: frappe/erpnext <erpnext@noreply.github.com> Cc: Rgottsch1 <rgottschalk@gem-mfg.com>; Author <author@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [frappe/erpnext] [Paid Development] (#9949) If you are not hell bent to getting this done by ERPNext company then I would advise you to post this on: https://erpnext.org/erpnext-jobs — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#9949 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcNZC9PVIKMUky9Kd1EnyTRmvAXD7rk2ks5sPZa4gaJpZM4OcKTV>.

[joolsr]

I think you should always strongly consider getting Frappe (the main developers behind ERPNext) to go with this paid development as they understand this stuff better than anyone. There are some other really good ERPNext developers in other companies, but its always far better to get a feature such as PLM added to the core rather than as an addon, as fixes will become part of the core too, and everyone benefits. Separate ERPNext apps sometimes are slightly outside of the general thinking and dont get updated so often or inline with core which moves very quickly ..

[Rgottsch1]

I understand and agree. So, can I anticipate a quote from Frappe on adding PLM, they are on this email string and have what is needed to proceed a sponser cost? Rob Gottschalk [Part 2.2] GEM Manufacturing, Inc. p: 262-857-7274 x 217 | f: 262-857-2917 From: Julian Robbins [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:42 AM To: frappe/erpnext <erpnext@noreply.github.com> Cc: Rgottsch1 <rgottschalk@gem-mfg.com>; Author <author@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [frappe/erpnext] [Paid Development] Product Life Management PLM (#9949) I think you should always strongly consider getting Frappe (the main developers behind ERPNext) to go with this paid development as they understand this stuff better than anyone. There are some other really good ERPNext developers in other companies, but its always far better to get a feature such as PLM added to the core rather than as an addon, as fixes will become part of the core too, and everyone benefits. Separate ERPNext apps sometimes are slightly outside of the general thinking and dont get updated so often or inline with core which moves very quickly .. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#9949 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcNZC8PXi6eQkc9Ap0DWE520QRjwXavCks5sPiPFgaJpZM4OcKTV>.

[joolsr]

@Rgottsch1 read this if you haven't already https://erpnext.com/pricing/paid-feature-development send an email to hello@erpnext.com

[epochc]

@Rgottsch1 I think these features can be rolled into the Manufacturing Module that we are looking to enhance. I will loop you into another conversation we are having around the manufacturing module and you can see if that's something you want to contribute to.

Thanks

Jay

[Rgottsch1]

Sounds good thankyou. Rob Gottschalk GEM Mfg, Inc

…

________________________________ From: epochc <notifications@github.com> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 12:09:23 AM To: frappe/erpnext Cc: Rgottsch1; Mention Subject: Re: [frappe/erpnext] [Paid Development] Product Life Management PLM (#9949) @Rgottsch1<https://github.com/rgottsch1> I think these features can be rolled into the Manufacturing Module that we are looking to enhance. I will loop you into another conversation we are having around the manufacturing module and you can see if that's something you want to contribute to. Thanks Jay — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#9949 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcNZCyyxYonIlm31P7yhR3TDrfER_cZ3ks5sPuECgaJpZM4OcKTV>.

[rmehta]

@Rgottsch1 you can also get a developer and then ask them to contribute it back to the core.

[asharamseervi]

Hello @Rgottsch1, Is there any status of feature requested by you? or this already contributed to core?

[dalers]

I am also very interested in Manufacturing and in particular PLM and a change management process starting with design or engineering documentation, including work instructions, test procedures, sustaining development or manufacturability improvement, etc., all of which need revision control.

@Rgottsch1 did you find a solution?

@epochc, am I correct to understand there was a teleconference of manufacturing developers November 2017 on Jitsi? Was there a document or anything can can be reviewed as a result of the Jitsi discussion?

Fwiw, I have come across a couple discussions on document control that might be related.

• Discuss topic started by @Ben_Cornwell_Mott (@bcornwellmott) https://discuss.erpnext.com/t/feature-proposal-improving-document-control/28924

• Discuss topic started by @jayram https://discuss.erpnext.com/t/enhancing-the-manufacturing-module/18401

[creador30]

This is also a long awaited feature for us.
Among the most important aspects of a PLM is the restriction of document revisions from unauthorized users. In order to have a proper PLM inside ERPNext, we need to have user/role permissions for attachments.