Call for proposals: help scale interoperability across Europe with the next “Interoperable Europe solutions”

[andrecastro0o]

Hei @sjaakd,

This call for “Interoperable Europe solutions” might be fitting for the Dataverse exporter-dcat3 & help in its promotion & adoption

see call https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/interoperable-europe/news/call-proposals-next-interoperable-europe-solutions
& submission https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/interoperable-europe-solutions#paragraph-61075

Interoperable Europe is inviting public administrations and the wider interoperability community to propose mature, reusable solutions that can be recommended EU‑wide and promoted for adoption.
“Solutions” can include shared building blocks that public administrations can reuse across systems and borders such as common data models and technical specifications that make it easier for administrations to exchange data and design compatible services.
The label is designed to spotlight mature, reusable interoperability solutions that should be considered in the context of interoperability assessments, making it easier for administrations to identify trusted components rather than reinventing them separately.

Submission does not seem that complicated.

[sjaakd]

Ha @andrecastro0o , what do you propose? I think that some attention would benefit this plugin.

[andrecastro0o]

@sjaakd as far as I understand, from https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/interoperable-europe-solutions, by filling the form in that page, a solution ie. Dataverse DCAT-AP metadata exporter, can be considered for the Interoperable Europe Solution label.

I did not find any info on what the label will look like or where the tools with the label will be listed, but might be worth and low effort to submit to that.

I can do a submission, but probably will be best done by the main developer ;)

Let me know

[sjaakd]

@andrecastro0o I'll have a look myself later. First I want to focus on having the software correct and actually have some usage. I need to adapt the profile for our own purposes and latest mapping. I wanted to do that this week. Besides myself, it is good to have another reference out there, so perhaps incorporate @PaulBoon or your experiences to validate the plugin functions correctly.

Then again.. it might be a chicken-and-egg problem, right? Having use drives the solution to encourage further usage and contribution. If you want, you can have a go at it right now.

I'll leave this issue open to remind myself 😄