Hello,
I'm attempting to use the LUA plugins with Wireshark 2.6 on Windows 7 SP1 x64. When I reload the LUA plugins, I'm getting an error on line 174 in the xcmp.lua plugin:
Lua: Error during loading:
[string "C:\Program Files\Wireshark\plugins\2.6\xcmp.l..."]:174: bad argument #1 to
'new' (Field_new: a field with this name must exist)
If I open the xcmp.lua file, I see the following (lines 173 to 175):
-- dofile("xnl.luainc") -- uncomment to fix dependency order
local xnl_opcode = Field.new("xnl.opcode")
local xnl_transaction = Field.new("xnl.transaction")
The lines already appear to have been uncommented. I haven't tried to see what happens when commenting them out. I assume that they are uncommented because they are required.
I found the following article on Google that sounds similar to what's going on here but I'm stuck at this point:
https://osqa-ask.wireshark.org/questions/34562/lua-bad-argument-1-to-fieldnew-a-field-with-this-name-must-exist)
Any thoughts as to what might be happening here?
Hello,
I'm attempting to use the LUA plugins with Wireshark 2.6 on Windows 7 SP1 x64. When I reload the LUA plugins, I'm getting an error on line 174 in the xcmp.lua plugin:
Lua: Error during loading:
[string "C:\Program Files\Wireshark\plugins\2.6\xcmp.l..."]:174: bad argument #1 to
'new' (Field_new: a field with this name must exist)
If I open the xcmp.lua file, I see the following (lines 173 to 175):
-- dofile("xnl.luainc") -- uncomment to fix dependency order
local xnl_opcode = Field.new("xnl.opcode")
local xnl_transaction = Field.new("xnl.transaction")
The lines already appear to have been uncommented. I haven't tried to see what happens when commenting them out. I assume that they are uncommented because they are required.
I found the following article on Google that sounds similar to what's going on here but I'm stuck at this point:
https://osqa-ask.wireshark.org/questions/34562/lua-bad-argument-1-to-fieldnew-a-field-with-this-name-must-exist)
Any thoughts as to what might be happening here?