You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 3, 2026. It is now read-only.
With version 6.5.2 you'll get a "no such object" error (which is normal):
Error: No such object: demo-test.appspot.com/test
at new ApiError (/workspace/node_modules/@google-cloud/storage/build/src/nodejs-common/util.js:79:15)
at Util.parseHttpRespBody (/workspace/node_modules/@google-cloud/storage/build/src/nodejs-common/util.js:214:38)
at Util.handleResp (/workspace/node_modules/@google-cloud/storage/build/src/nodejs-common/util.js:155:117)
at /workspace/node_modules/@google-cloud/storage/build/src/nodejs-common/util.js:536:22
at onResponse (/workspace/node_modules/retry-request/index.js:240:7)
at /workspace/node_modules/teeny-request/build/src/index.js:217:17
at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
With version 6.5.3 you'll get a "not implemented" error:
Error: Not Implemented
at new ApiError (/workspace/node_modules/@google-cloud/storage/build/src/nodejs-common/util.js:79:15)
at Util.parseHttpRespMessage (/workspace/node_modules/@google-cloud/storage/build/src/nodejs-common/util.js:181:41)
at Util.handleResp (/workspace/node_modules/@google-cloud/storage/build/src/nodejs-common/util.js:155:76)
at /workspace/node_modules/@google-cloud/storage/build/src/nodejs-common/util.js:536:22
at onResponse (/workspace/node_modules/retry-request/index.js:240:7)
at /workspace/node_modules/teeny-request/build/src/index.js:226:13
at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
This is a minimal reproducible example, however I encountered this bug while using the Storage client through the firebase-admin/storage package. Everything else equal (firebase-admin version included), my tests pass with version 6.5.2 of the client, and fail with "Not Implemented" errors when using 6.5.3.
If the new behaviour / URLs are indeed the expected ones, then this could also be a bug in the Firebase Storage emulator.
Environment details
macOS168@google-cloud/storageversion:6.5.3Steps to reproduce
Run the following code against the Firebase Storage emulator:
With version
6.5.2you'll get a "no such object" error (which is normal):With version
6.5.3you'll get a "not implemented" error:This is a minimal reproducible example, however I encountered this bug while using the Storage client through the
firebase-admin/storagepackage. Everything else equal (firebase-adminversion included), my tests pass with version6.5.2of the client, and fail with "Not Implemented" errors when using6.5.3.If the new behaviour / URLs are indeed the expected ones, then this could also be a bug in the Firebase Storage emulator.
Probably related: