r/secretsmanager_secret_policy - new resource#14468
Conversation
b9c11da to
230324c
Compare
|
Rebased + added support for blocking public access: |
e69fffb to
5db1047
Compare
|
Hi, |
|
Can we get an update on this PR please 👍 |
bill-rich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great overall. I had about one of the conditions that came up twice. Please let me know on those.
| return nil | ||
| }) | ||
| if isResourceTimeoutError(err) { | ||
| res, err = conn.PutResourcePolicy(input) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is the policy being applied again if the previous attempt timed out? Is this an expected condition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bill-rich this is required in the AWS Provider due to how the AWS Go SDK works, see also:
| return nil | ||
| }) | ||
| if isResourceTimeoutError(err) { | ||
| _, err = conn.PutResourcePolicy(input) |
5db1047 to
91e4655
Compare
|
Rebased for acceptance test config lint |
bill-rich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I got my question answered. LGTM
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Community Note
Closes #14618
Release note for CHANGELOG:
Output from acceptance testing: