Support return array#22
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
tunnckoCore
force-pushed
the
support-return-array
branch
from
202b6e0 to
0b5479a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
|
Someone on that? @SimenB? |
Signed-off-by: Charlike Mike Reagent <opensource@tunnckocore.com>
|
Any chance getting this merged. Got a fork with these changes only would be good if they were in the repo. |
| if (Array.isArray(testResult)) { | ||
| testResult.forEach(result => | ||
| result.numFailingTests > 0 | ||
| ? onFailure(test, new Error(result.errorMessage)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this correct? I thought onResult was called with all test results regardless of whether the result is a failure or not, and onFailure was called if the test framework errored out. That might be wrong though, I haven't looked into the source code of this module for some time 😅
Could you show an example of how this is used in a runner and how it looks when used in Jest?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You are correct, onFailure is when the framework errors out. It is passed a SerializableError
I am working on this jest-python. It would be good to see if it was at all possible to simplify its implementation with this library.
| .then(testResult => { | ||
| if (Array.isArray(testResult)) { | ||
| testResult.forEach(result => | ||
| result.numFailingTests > 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you do an if rather than the ternary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, soon maybe cuz I'm not active in the past year.
|
@tunnckoCore ping 🙂 |
|
Uh yea, hey there, long time... I can't get on that soon. Not that active. I published a fork on my |
3 participants
resolves #20 and #21