chore(jest-haste-map): remove support for ignorePattern as function#10348
chore(jest-haste-map): remove support for ignorePattern as function#10348SimenB merged 8 commits intojestjs:masterfrom komtaki:delete-haste-map-ignore-pattern-func
Conversation
|
Hi @komtaki! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@fb.com. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks! |
2 similar comments
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks! |
|
I've added this to the jest 27 milestone, so I'll merge when we're ready to land breaking changes. I'll deal with conflicts at that time, so you don't have keep resolving conflicts 🙂 |
|
@komtaki seems we're skipping some tests on windows that are failing on mac and linux - mind taking a look? |
|
We have a conflict here - can you either merge in master or rebase on it? |
Co-authored-by: Simen Bekkhus <sbekkhus91@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Simen Bekkhus <sbekkhus91@gmail.com>
|
@SimenB And I organized commits. All CI tests passed !! 👍 |
|
Thanks @komtaki! This should be good to go when we're ready to land breaking changes now 👍 |
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Summary
Fixes #10342
Test plan
Unit test was succeed.