Conversation
japaric
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2021
Member
japaric
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is better. Thanks.
That's right, it's 200 Bytes smaller.
was that with opt-level=3? maybe the indexing prevents loop unrolling and that makes the binary smaller? I would have no idea why keeping the assume-uninit makes the program that much smaller though. llvm optimizations are unpredictable IMO
Member
|
bors r+ |
Contributor
|
Merge conflict. |
Contributor
Author
It was |
Member
|
needs a rebase but feel free to submit to bors once that's resolved |
131c35a to
767c462
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
bors r=japaric |
Contributor
|
Build succeeded: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This removes all unchecked indexing as well as the usage of
MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init()from the leb64 encoding logic.Resulting binary size change for the
logbinary:That's right, it's 200 Bytes smaller.
I've also tried keeping
MaybeUninitin place, which reduces binary size by like 400 more bytes. That seemed spooky, so I didn't go for that (zeroing 10 bytes shouldn't take 400 Bytes of code space? does it pull inmemset? does it miscompile something due to the UB?). Haven't investigated that further.