[Merged by Bors] - feat: real-valued Lᵖ norm#23881
[Merged by Bors] - feat: real-valued Lᵖ norm#23881YaelDillies wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
PR summary 4e498b8337Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
|
This pull request has conflicts, please merge |
b-mehta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks reasonable enough to me, but I'd like an analyst to check too.
maintainer merge
|
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by b-mehta. |
sgouezel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not completely sure I am convinced by the PR: one lesson from Carleson is that when you formalize analysis, you need the ennreal-valued norms, and the real-valued norms. Can you explain why you think the nnreal valued version is more important than the real-valued?
| variable {α E : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α} | ||
| [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f g h : α → E} | ||
|
|
||
| lemma coe_nnLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm (hf : MemLp f p μ) : nnLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm f p μ := by |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you think the MemLp assumption will be inferrable in practice?
|
This pull request has conflicts, please merge |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please merge |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please merge |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please merge |
8195db9 to
7be37b8
Compare
|
bors r+ |
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded:
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.