[Merged by Bors] - feat(Analysis/InnerProductSpace/MulOpposite): defines the inner product on opposite spaces#25951
Conversation
PR summary 85598ed4dfImport changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
|
I'm not saying we can't have it, but why do you need this? I only see this being viable for |
|
@j-loreaux, also viable for |
|
The Frobenius norm on But I guess the question is still: do you have a case in mind where you'll need the inner product structure on the opposite? It seems like it would almost never be necessary. |
|
-awaiting-author |
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
|
✌️ themathqueen can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
|
bors r+ |
…ct on opposite spaces (#25951) This pr defines the inner product on opposite spaces. Motivation for having the inner product structure on the opposite: One application comes up in non-commutative graphs, which are defined on a finite-dimensional C*-algebra with a faithful and positive functional (a Hilbert space structure can be induced by the defined faithful and positive functional (will be added to a pr soon)). For example, we'd need the Hilbert space structure to be defined on the opposite space to define the isomorphism: `(A →ₗ[ℂ] B) ≃ₗ[ℂ] TensorProduct ℂ B Aᵐᵒᵖ`, where `A`, `B` are again finite-dimensional C*-algebras with faithful and positive functionals. Co-authored-by: themathqueen <23701951+themathqueen@users.noreply.github.com>
|
bors r- |
|
Canceled. |
|
bors r+ |
…ct on opposite spaces (#25951) This pr defines the inner product on opposite spaces. Motivation for having the inner product structure on the opposite: One application comes up in non-commutative graphs, which are defined on a finite-dimensional C*-algebra with a faithful and positive functional (a Hilbert space structure can be induced by the defined faithful and positive functional (will be added to a pr soon)). For example, we'd need the Hilbert space structure to be defined on the opposite space to define the isomorphism: `(A →ₗ[ℂ] B) ≃ₗ[ℂ] TensorProduct ℂ B Aᵐᵒᵖ`, where `A`, `B` are again finite-dimensional C*-algebras with faithful and positive functionals. Co-authored-by: Monica Omar <2497250a@research.gla.ac.uk>
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
…ct on opposite spaces (leanprover-community#25951) This pr defines the inner product on opposite spaces. Motivation for having the inner product structure on the opposite: One application comes up in non-commutative graphs, which are defined on a finite-dimensional C*-algebra with a faithful and positive functional (a Hilbert space structure can be induced by the defined faithful and positive functional (will be added to a pr soon)). For example, we'd need the Hilbert space structure to be defined on the opposite space to define the isomorphism: `(A →ₗ[ℂ] B) ≃ₗ[ℂ] TensorProduct ℂ B Aᵐᵒᵖ`, where `A`, `B` are again finite-dimensional C*-algebras with faithful and positive functionals. Co-authored-by: Monica Omar <2497250a@research.gla.ac.uk>
…ct on opposite spaces (leanprover-community#25951) This pr defines the inner product on opposite spaces. Motivation for having the inner product structure on the opposite: One application comes up in non-commutative graphs, which are defined on a finite-dimensional C*-algebra with a faithful and positive functional (a Hilbert space structure can be induced by the defined faithful and positive functional (will be added to a pr soon)). For example, we'd need the Hilbert space structure to be defined on the opposite space to define the isomorphism: `(A →ₗ[ℂ] B) ≃ₗ[ℂ] TensorProduct ℂ B Aᵐᵒᵖ`, where `A`, `B` are again finite-dimensional C*-algebras with faithful and positive functionals. Co-authored-by: Monica Omar <2497250a@research.gla.ac.uk>
…ct on opposite spaces (leanprover-community#25951) This pr defines the inner product on opposite spaces. Motivation for having the inner product structure on the opposite: One application comes up in non-commutative graphs, which are defined on a finite-dimensional C*-algebra with a faithful and positive functional (a Hilbert space structure can be induced by the defined faithful and positive functional (will be added to a pr soon)). For example, we'd need the Hilbert space structure to be defined on the opposite space to define the isomorphism: `(A →ₗ[ℂ] B) ≃ₗ[ℂ] TensorProduct ℂ B Aᵐᵒᵖ`, where `A`, `B` are again finite-dimensional C*-algebras with faithful and positive functionals. Co-authored-by: Monica Omar <2497250a@research.gla.ac.uk>
…ct on opposite spaces (leanprover-community#25951) This pr defines the inner product on opposite spaces. Motivation for having the inner product structure on the opposite: One application comes up in non-commutative graphs, which are defined on a finite-dimensional C*-algebra with a faithful and positive functional (a Hilbert space structure can be induced by the defined faithful and positive functional (will be added to a pr soon)). For example, we'd need the Hilbert space structure to be defined on the opposite space to define the isomorphism: `(A →ₗ[ℂ] B) ≃ₗ[ℂ] TensorProduct ℂ B Aᵐᵒᵖ`, where `A`, `B` are again finite-dimensional C*-algebras with faithful and positive functionals. Co-authored-by: Monica Omar <2497250a@research.gla.ac.uk>
This pr defines the inner product on opposite spaces.
Motivation for having the inner product structure on the opposite:
One application comes up in non-commutative graphs, which are defined on a finite-dimensional C*-algebra with a faithful and positive functional (a Hilbert space structure can be induced by the defined faithful and positive functional (will be added to a pr soon)). For example, we'd need the Hilbert space structure to be defined on the opposite space to define the isomorphism:
(A →ₗ[ℂ] B) ≃ₗ[ℂ] TensorProduct ℂ B Aᵐᵒᵖ, whereA,Bare again finite-dimensional C*-algebras with faithful and positive functionals.