Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - feat(RingTheory/Polynomial): some lemmas about Ideal.leadingCoeff#37336

Closed
mbkybky wants to merge 8 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
mbkybky:leadingCoeff
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - feat(RingTheory/Polynomial): some lemmas about Ideal.leadingCoeff#37336
mbkybky wants to merge 8 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
mbkybky:leadingCoeff

Conversation

@mbkybky
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mbkybky mbkybky commented Mar 29, 2026

Add some lemmas about Ideal.leadingCoeff.


Open in Gitpod

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 29, 2026

PR summary 044631201f

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

+ leadingCoeff_finset_prod_le
+ leadingCoeff_mono
+ leadingCoeff_mul_le
+ leadingCoeff_pow_le
+ leadingCoeff_top
+ map_C_comap_of_comap_eq_leadingCoeff
+ map_C_leadingCoeff

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/pr_summary/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/pr_summary/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

The doc-module for scripts/pr_summary/declarations_diff.sh contains some details about this script.


No changes to technical debt.

You can run this locally as

./scripts/reporting/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary
  • The relative value is the weighted sum of the differences with weight given by the inverse of the current value of the statistic.
  • The absolute value is the relative value divided by the total sum of the inverses of the current values (i.e. the weighted average of the differences).

@github-actions github-actions bot added the t-ring-theory Ring theory label Mar 29, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 29, 2026

✅ PR Title Formatted Correctly

The title of this PR has been updated to match our commit style conventions.
Thank you!

@mbkybky mbkybky changed the title feat(RingTheory/Polynomial) : some lemmas about Ideal.leadingCoeff feat(RingTheory/Polynomial): some lemmas about Ideal.leadingCoeff Mar 29, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@riccardobrasca riccardobrasca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

bors d+

@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Apr 14, 2026

✌️ mbkybky can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@mathlib-triage mathlib-triage bot added the delegated This pull request has been delegated to the PR author (or occasionally another non-maintainer). label Apr 14, 2026
mbkybky and others added 2 commits April 14, 2026 18:17
@mbkybky
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

mbkybky commented Apr 14, 2026

bors r+

mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2026
…37336)

Add some lemmas about [Ideal.leadingCoeff](https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib4_docs/Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.html#Ideal.leadingCoeff).

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci-lite[bot] <117423508+pre-commit-ci-lite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(RingTheory/Polynomial): some lemmas about Ideal.leadingCoeff [Merged by Bors] - feat(RingTheory/Polynomial): some lemmas about Ideal.leadingCoeff Apr 14, 2026
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Apr 14, 2026
@mbkybky mbkybky deleted the leadingCoeff branch April 14, 2026 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

delegated This pull request has been delegated to the PR author (or occasionally another non-maintainer). t-ring-theory Ring theory

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants