feat: accept t as function

[semoal]

Closes #800

Couldn't update the docs because i'm shit writing tables with RST.. any suggerence? haha

[vercel]

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/lingui-js/js-lingui/pngj51p80
✅ Preview: https://js-lingui-git-feat-accept-t-as-expression.lingui-js.now.sh

[tricoder42]

I don't know either. It's pain. But it looks good when it's done. I'll write the docs tonight. Thanks for the PR, I'll review it tonight as well!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #807 into main will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #807      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.36%   84.45%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        1266     1274       +8     
  Branches      334      335       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1068     1076       +8     
  Misses        118      118              
  Partials       80       80              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/macro/src/macroJs.ts	89.55% <100.00%> (+0.66%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eb68e51...4b430a0. Read the comment docs.

[tricoder42]

Docs added, PR looks good! Great job 👍

[Bertg]

Hi!

So I was trying to use this functionality today (using v3.0.3) but I'm getting a typescript error:

          <li>
            {t({id: "long_value"})}
          </li>

Argument of type '{ id: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'TemplateStringsArray'.
  Object literal may only specify known properties, and 'id' does not exist in type 'TemplateStringsArray'.ts(2345)

I'm guessing the typescript definitions did not get updated?

[tricoder42]

It just wasn't released yet. We don't have an automatic release process for pre-releases and I wanted to make a new minor release next week on Monday. There's still few new features in development.

[Bertg]

@tricoder42 Oh! Ok now i see! That makes sense.

However, the public documentation already mentions this feature. That is why I wanted to try it.
Maybe there is a need to look at the documentation release process?

[tricoder42]

Yeah, this is a mistake... We should merge new features into a next branch next time, so we can publish pre-releases and documentation preview independently on what's currently in main. Good point, thanks 👍