Add new feature request template#613
Conversation
meta-cla
bot
added
the
CLA Signed
| Describe the problem you're trying to solve or the use case for this feature. | ||
| What is the motivation behind this request? Why would this feature be valuable? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
fine to keep as is, but i think it could be a one liner
| required: true | ||
| - type: textarea | ||
| attributes: | ||
| label: 💡 What does this look like in pseudo-code? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not sure if i like this. The intention is good, but maybe too much overhead? e.g. someone requesting multiturn or LoRA. Do they need to come up with a design? Perhaps we could reword to something like "Share any examples or pseudo-code if you have it"
| required: false | ||
| - type: textarea | ||
| attributes: | ||
| label: ✅ Acceptance Criteria |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Again, intention is good, but it feels like a bit too much overhead. How would an user fill this with "request for LoRA" or "request for multiturn"?
felipemello1
left a comment
felipemello1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am still a bit skeptical about the complexity of the template, but lets merge it. Please try create a couple of dummy issues as if you were an user. If it feels like a nice experience, we keep it as is, otherwise we see what we can remove/simplify
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #613 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.10% 83.23% -0.88%
==========================================
Files 29 31 +2
Lines 3687 3954 +267
==========================================
+ Hits 3101 3291 +190
- Misses 586 663 +77 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
3 participants
No description provided.