Don't show editScalingRange on another ScaleItem if a draft item already exists#758
Don't show editScalingRange on another ScaleItem if a draft item already exists#758MicroFish91 merged 3 commits intomainfrom
editScalingRange on another ScaleItem if a draft item already exists#758Conversation
|
An alternative to this method is to keep showing the command, but throw an error when they try to edit another scale item that isn't the current draft. My thoughts on why this might be less confusing is because sometimes users don't understand/remember why commands mysteriously disappeared on them. By having the error, it will remind the user that "oh, hey, I do have a current working draft" |
|
I'm okay with either approach, just wanted to hear thoughts |
|
Yeah hmm, let me think on this one a bit. I think I initially wanted to do it that way as well but for some reason I decided against it. I'll get back to you |
692b2f4 to
3e7e508
Compare
|
Couldn't remember a good reason not to do it the way you mentioned, I think it's a better solution as well because it's simpler for us to understand and now we can use these utility functions to easily add the same checks to other template items |
Fix an issue where
editScalingRangewas showing up on other revision items even when a draft node already existed. In my opinion, it's confusing / doesn't make sense to allow users to try editing other revisions simultaneously when another draft already exists.