Skip to content

mizcausevic-dev/state-employment-ai-disclosure-tracker

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

state-employment-ai-disclosure-tracker

State Employment AI Disclosure Tracker v0.1 draft. A per-jurisdiction lifecycle ledger of US state legislative statutes, local ordinances, state civil-rights-agency guidance, and state DOL pre-rule guidance governing employment-AI tools — from proposed to in-committee / passed-one-chamber to enacted-awaiting-effective to effective to amended / superseded / sunset / vetoed / withdrawn. The Operator surface an employer, AI vendor, or bias auditor queries to know which jurisdiction's employment-AI obligations govern a hiring / promotion / performance / termination decision on a given date.

Part of the Kinetic Gain Protocol Suite.

Status: v0.1 draft. Schema at schema/disclosure-event.schema.json, per-jurisdiction streams at states/, Node verifier at src/verify.mjs.

Why this exists

Employment-AI regulation is fragmenting at three levels: federal floor (EEOC AI Guidance May 2023, Title VII, ADA, ADEA, GINA, OFCCP), state statutes (IL AI Video Interview Act, MD HB 1202, CO SB 24-205, CA AB 331-or-DFEH-regs, and 12+ proposed bills), and local ordinances (NYC Local Law 144 is the headline). An employer hiring a NYC-resident candidate via a video-interview AI tool operated by a federal contractor headquartered in CO is bound by NYC LL 144 AEDT + EEOC AI Guidance + OFCCP regs + CO SB 24-205 + IL 820 ILCS 42 (if the role is partly IL-based) + Title VII. Decision Cards have to reference the obligation set in force at the decision date. This lifecycle ledger answers "what is in force for this jurisdiction on this date" deterministically.

The shape

Field Purpose
event_id, jurisdiction, timestamp Append-only stamped identity. jurisdiction accepts US-XX AND US-XX-CITY (e.g. US-NY-NYC) — the only Suite tracker that supports sub-state jurisdictions, because NYC LL 144 is THE headline employment-AI law
lifecycle_state One of 10 (proposed → in-committee → passed-one-chamber → enacted-awaiting-effective → effective → amended → superseded → sunset → vetoed → withdrawn)
regulatory_vehicle One of 6 (state-legislative-statute, local-ordinance, state-civil-rights-agency-guidance, state-dol-pre-rule-guidance, state-doi-bulletin, city-or-county-rule)
citation Short label + long title + jurisdictional URI + session year
effective_date / sunset_date REQUIRED when respective lifecycle_state
scope 10-decision covered_decisions + 9-actor covered_actors + minimum employer size + geographic scope
obligation_kinds 17-doctrine obligation taxonomy including HR-Tech-specific obligations
regulator Primary agency + concurrent jurisdiction
supersedes_event_id REQUIRED when amended / superseded

Seed coverage (v0.1)

Jurisdiction Last lifecycle_state Key citation
US-NY-NYC effective (2023-07-05) NYC Local Law 144 — first US AEDT-specific bias-audit law
US-IL amended (effective 2026-01-01) IL 820 ILCS 42 (Video Interview Act) layered with HB 3773 (PA 104-0049 consequential-decisions)
US-MD effective (2020-10-01) MD HB 1202 (Chapter 595) facial-recognition prohibition
US-CA withdrawn CA AB 331 held in committee; DFEH/CRD took up FEHA rulemaking instead
US-CO effective (2026-02-01) CO SB 24-205 — applies to consequential decisions including employment

Quick start

npm install
npm run verify

Exit 0 on success, 1 on schema, 2 on illegal transition, 3 on broken supersedes, 4 on IO.

Composes with

Repo Role
employment-decision-record-audit-stream Per-decision audit events that must conform to whichever obligation_kinds were effective at the time
state-real-estate-ai-disclosure-tracker Sibling PropTech
state-insurance-ai-disclosure-tracker Sibling InsurTech
state-ai-disclosure-state-tracker Sibling EdTech
fda-samd-classification-board Sibling HealthTech regulatory-lifecycle Operator

Compliance posture

HR-Tech-readiness scaffolding for state and local employment-AI regulatory tracking. Does not establish compliance with any state law or local ordinance — local employment counsel + state civil-rights / DOL agency engagement remain authoritative. Per the standing public-language guardrail: readiness · evidence · posture · controls · scaffolding — never "NYC-LL-144-compliant" or "EEOC-attested" without an external attestation specific to the jurisdiction.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.

About

HR Tech Operator: per-jurisdiction lifecycle ledger of US state + local employment-AI laws. First Suite tracker supporting sub-state jurisdictions (US-XX-CITY pattern). Seed: NYC LL 144, IL 820 ILCS 42 + HB 3773, MD HB 1202, CA AB 331, CO SB 24-205.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors