ppoll: make sigmask parameter optional#1739
Merged
bors[bot] merged 1 commit intonix-rust:masterfrom Jun 9, 2022
Merged
Conversation
rtzoeller
reviewed
Jun 9, 2022
ppoll(2) supports 'sigmask' as NULL. In that case no signal mask manipulation is performed. Let's make `sigmask` parameter of `nix::poll::ppoll` optional to allow that behaviour. Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
stefano-garzarella
force-pushed
the
ppoll-sigset-optional
branch
from
944ea59 to
c3081e4
Compare
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ppoll(2) supports 'sigmask' as NULL. In that case no signal mask
manipulation is performed.
Let's make
sigmaskparameter ofnix::poll::ppolloptionalto allow that behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella sgarzare@redhat.com