Skip to content

[Work in progress] Aanpassingen: gemeente Leiden#1165

Open
LeidscheJurgen wants to merge 129 commits intomainfrom
Leiden-2025-Q4
Open

[Work in progress] Aanpassingen: gemeente Leiden#1165
LeidscheJurgen wants to merge 129 commits intomainfrom
Leiden-2025-Q4

Conversation

@LeidscheJurgen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • Font
  • Border radius

- Font
- Border radius
@LeidscheJurgen LeidscheJurgen requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2025 13:33
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Oct 13, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
themes Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 12, 2026 8:01am

Request Review

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Oct 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.51%. Comparing base (e3a7319) to head (7248f6d).
⚠️ Report is 24 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1165   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.51%   89.51%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1392     1392           
  Branches      143      132   -11     
=======================================
  Hits         1246     1246           
  Misses        146      146           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Robbert Robbert marked this pull request as draft October 14, 2025 06:33
@Robbert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Robbert commented Oct 14, 2025

@LeidscheJurgen Naar aanleiding van ons gesprek, heb ik even de PR op "Draft" gezet, zodat hij niet in het lijstje komt te staan van PRs waar het kernteam een review op moet doen. Wanneer je een strik om deze branch wil doen, kun je op "Ready for review" klikken.

@LeidscheJurgen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks! ik zal er in het vervolg ff beter op letten.

@Robbert Robbert changed the title Aanpassingen: [Work in progress] Aanpassingen: gemeente Leiden Oct 17, 2025
- cleanup old files
- wordpress theme.json formatter

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard van Heuven van Staereling <richadr@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rozerin <84851545+Rozerinay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: NL Design System <admin@nldesignsystem.nl>
Co-authored-by: Menno van Slooten <menno.vanslooten@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Roy Honders <rhonders@quintor.nl>
Co-authored-by: Robbert Broersma <git@robbertbroersma.nl>
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Lauwers <jeffreylauwers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: NL Design System Bot <79643794+nl-design-system-ci@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlotte Gieltjes <charlotte.gieltjes@rebels.io>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@WinsleyJ WinsleyJ marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2026 09:11
@WinsleyJ WinsleyJ requested review from a team as code owners February 12, 2026 09:11
@WinsleyJ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Robbert Deze pull request is ready for review. Hoe gaat dit precies in zijn werking? Kijken jullie naar de merge conflicts of moeten wij dat zelf doen?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants