Revert "jenkins: improve x64 node.exe caching for arm64 (#3514)"#3533
Merged
richardlau merged 1 commit intonodejs:mainfrom Oct 19, 2023
Merged
Conversation
This reverts commit 646ff04. The change being reverted broke basic sanity check in the node-compile-windows-debug job in test CI.
richardlau
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2023
StefanStojanovic
added a commit
to JaneaSystems/build
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2024
Fixes: nodejs#3504 Refs: nodejs#3315 Refs: nodejs#3514 Refs: nodejs#3533
StefanStojanovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Urgent, should land ASAP
This reverts commit 646ff04.
The change being reverted broke the basic sanity check in the node-compile-windows-debug job in test CI.
This breaks all PR CI runs, so the first one to approve it from @nodejs/build should land it as well. As for the fix I'm reverting, I'll go back to the implementation to find the error and open a new PR once it's fixed.