Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

test: mark test-net-error-twice flaky on SmartOS#25760

Closed
misterdjules wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:v0.10from
misterdjules:mark-test-net-error-twice-flaky
Closed

test: mark test-net-error-twice flaky on SmartOS#25760
misterdjules wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:v0.10from
misterdjules:mark-test-net-error-twice-flaky

Conversation

@misterdjules
Copy link
Copy Markdown

It seems that test-net-error-twice.js does not behave as expected. Its
goal is to test fireErrorCallbacks, but it doesn't do it correctly,
leading to false negatives on some platforms and failures on others.
This change marks this test as flaky so that we can use our CI to land
changes in the v0.10 branch until we can fix it properly.

See the corresponding issue at
#9325 for more details.

It seems that test-net-error-twice.js does not behave as expected. Its
goal is to test fireErrorCallbacks, but it doesn't do it correctly,
leading to false negatives on some platforms and failures on others.
This change marks this test as flaky so that we can use our CI to land
changes in the v0.10 branch until we can fix it properly.

See the corresponding issue at
nodejs#9325 for more details.
@misterdjules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/cc @joyent/node-collaborators

@joaocgreis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

misterdjules pushed a commit to misterdjules/node that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2015
It seems that test-net-error-twice.js does not behave as expected. Its
goal is to test fireErrorCallbacks, but it doesn't do it correctly,
leading to false negatives on some platforms and failures on others.
This change marks this test as flaky so that we can use our CI to land
changes in the v0.10 branch until we can fix it properly.

See the corresponding issue at
nodejs#9325 for more details.

PR: nodejs#25760
PR-URL: nodejs#25760
Reviewed-By: João Reis <reis@janeasystems.com>
@misterdjules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Landed in 7df5770, thank you @joaocgreis!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants