Requesting TC review for Python Logs API/SDK spec compliance

[jeremydvoss]

I have been investigating if Python's logging signal is ready to be stabilized. Could we get a TC member to look through the code and confirm that it is in line with the log spec and sem conv?

[UPDATE from @tigrannajaryan] Checklist to verify, borrowed from #1537 (checkmark means reviewed/verified against spec definition):

• Getting Started example works
  • Planning to add docs on logs in Getting Started? opentelemetry-python#3551
• LoggerProvider.Get Logger
  • Minor doc issues - Logs API: LoggerProvider docs issues opentelemetry-python#4318
• LoggerProvider.Get Logger accepts attributes
  • Minor doc issues - Logs API: LoggerProvider docs issues opentelemetry-python#4318
• LoggerProvider.Shutdown
  • Logs SDK: LoggerProvider is still functional after shutdown opentelemetry-python#4317
• LoggerProvider.ForceFlush
• Can get global LoggerProvider
• Can set global LoggerProvider
• Logger.Emit(LogRecord)
  • Logs API: not possible to use without SDK opentelemetry-python#4319
  • Logs API and SDK: logs attributes are allowed to have AnyValue values  opentelemetry-python#4315
• SimpleLogRecordProcessor
• BatchLogRecordProcessor
• Can plug custom LogRecordProcessor
• OTLP/gRPC exporter
• OTLP/HTTP exporter
• OTLP File exporter - According to compatibility matrix, not yet implemented.
• Can plug custom LogRecordExporter
  • Logs SDK: consider renaming *LogExporter to *LogRecordExporter and similar for consistency  opentelemetry-python#4321
• Trace Context Injection
  • yes, but only when using LoggingHandler bridge
  • Logs API: not possible to use without SDK opentelemetry-python#4319
• LogRecord fields output
  • Logs SDK: ConsoleLogExporter prints severity number as object, not a number opentelemetry-python#4322

[tigrannajaryan]

From what I understand this is a request for a TC review of Python Logging implementation. I will bring this up in the next TC meeting.

[tigrannajaryan]

@open-telemetry/python-maintainers can you please also confirm the review request?

[ocelotl]

Yes, @tigrannajaryan this is our request, thanks!

[tigrannajaryan]

@ocelotl thanks. I will confirm in the next TC meeting and will post back here who will do the review.

[tigrannajaryan]

Update: No TC meeting this week due to Kubecon, will be discussed next week.

[tigrannajaryan]

I will be doing the review.