Skip to content

TRUNK-6650: Verify database authentication in startup.sh before starting Tomcat#6193

Open
suubi-joshua wants to merge 2 commits into
openmrs:masterfrom
suubi-joshua:TRUNK-6650
Open

TRUNK-6650: Verify database authentication in startup.sh before starting Tomcat#6193
suubi-joshua wants to merge 2 commits into
openmrs:masterfrom
suubi-joshua:TRUNK-6650

Conversation

@suubi-joshua

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of what I changed

The startup.sh script currently waits for the database TCP port to be available via wait-for-it.sh, but does not verify that MariaDB is actually ready to accept authenticated connections. On Galera clusters and container orchestrators, the TCP port can open before InnoDB recovery completes, causing OpenMRS to start against a not-yet-ready database.

This adds a credential-verified check (mariadb -e "SELECT 1" with retry) after the TCP port check and before Tomcat starts. The
mariadb-client package is installed in the Docker image so the mariadb command is available at runtime.

30 retries at 2-second intervals (60s total) are sufficient since wait-for-it.sh already confirms the port is open, only the brief InnoDB recovery window (~12s on Galera) needs to pass.

This PR is as a result of this PR openmrs/openmrs-contrib-cluster#14

Issue I worked on

see https://openmrs.atlassian.net/browse/TRUNK-6650

Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)

  • My IDE is configured to follow the code style of this project.

    No? Unsure? -> configure your IDE, format the code and add the changes with git add . && git commit --amend

  • I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored
    existing code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)

    No? -> write tests and add them to this commit git add . && git commit --amend

  • I ran mvn clean package right before creating this pull request and
    added all formatting changes to my commit.

    No? -> execute above command

  • All new and existing tests passed.

    No? -> figure out why and add the fix to your commit. It is your responsibility to make sure your code works.

  • My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.

    No? Unsure? -> execute command git pull --rebase upstream master

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.29%. Comparing base (4fe6abf) to head (36ac10d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6193      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     59.34%   59.29%   -0.05%     
- Complexity     9331     9332       +1     
============================================
  Files           695      695              
  Lines         37460    37460              
  Branches       5517     5517              
============================================
- Hits          22231    22213      -18     
- Misses        13232    13246      +14     
- Partials       1997     2001       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants