Add operator to landuse=cemetery

[maro-21]

Add operator=* to landuse=cemetery.

[tordans]

Quick research:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=cemetery#combinations

Does not look like it is something that is used a lot ATM

[maro-21]

Yes, it's not used VERY often because there is no field in the editor. Usage frequency and a field in the editor are mutually dependent.
Anyway, cemeteries has operators.

[tordans]

Some more research:

• Current preset https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/blob/main/data/presets/landuse/cemetery.json
• Side note, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dgrave_yard is not relevant since those are only disused cemeteries so the operator is less important if any
• The english wiki did not mention operator until recently https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Alanduse%3Dcemetery&type=revision&diff=2750183&oldid=2536197
• The german wiki does mention it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery
  • operator:type since 2018 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE%3ATag%3Alanduse%3Dcemetery&type=revision&diff=1624353&oldid=1618777 and again 2021 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery&diff=next&oldid=2097536
  • operator since 2016 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery&diff=next&oldid=1288466

---

I am hesitant to add the field now given the low usage. But at the same time, I don't see that it can do any harm, so why not …

Any other opintions?

[matkoniecz]

I am also from Poland and here at least it makes perfect sense to record this. Putting it into moreFields should be quite harmless

[tyrasd]

I think the addition of the operator tag is relatively straight-forward, even though the wiki did not explicitly mention it in the past. It can be useful to distinguish city-run cemeteries (example) from church-run ones, or to know which church is running which cemetery in big cities.

Putting it into moreFields should be quite harmless

That seems like a good approach to me.