Update archaeological_site.json - Added terms

[danieldegroot2]

Added possible terms for archaeological site.

Description, Motivation & Context

Provide search terms for archaeological site for (non-)native readers/speakers.
_{Some terms may be too generic, therefore I would like input on possible alternatives, additions or removals.
Some terms may be clearly useless, may be dubious, or may be replaced by actual (relevant) nouns.}

Currently, it

• does not have any search terms
• has been barely changed since its creation.
• has a limited user/contributor interest group.
• can not always be found when it is not explicitly mentioned by its name in various sources.

See also

• OpenStreetMap - b-unicycling's diary: more archaeological discoveries and how should I map them?

_{Archaeological sites may be underground, underwater, some only visible in aerial or historical record. Some objects may occasionally represent finds, original locations of museum objects, concepts(settlement/natural), active/past visible archaeological dig/excavation sites / cuts/profiles (some in museums), etc.}

Related issues

N/A

Links and data

Relevant OSM Wiki links:
N/A

Relevant tag usage stats:
N/A

Test-Documentation

Preview links & Sidebar Screenshots

N/A

Search

Yes, successfully tested search term example using preview.
_{Hypothetical example. Crop marks when they are visible may surround a current landuse but it is uncommon. The actual object type might be a 'cow/cattle(/animal) cemetery island/plot(/enclosure)' but simply it is scrub/wood.}

(N/A; iD 2.40.0-dev / Chrome 146.0.7680.178 / Windows 10.)

Info-i

N/A

Wording

• American English
• N/A name, aliases (if present) use Title Case
• terms (if present) use lower case, sorted A-Z

[github-actions]

🍱 Your pull request preview is ready

Please use this preview to check your changes. Ideally use the test documentation template and document your test results by commenting on the PR. This will speed up the review process for everyone.

FYI, once this PR is merged, you can use the iD Editor Preview to test your changes in interaction with all other changes.

[matkoniecz]

these look reasonable (especially compared to the old list), I will wait some time to give others time to review

@ZeLonewolf @1ec5 - language PR, review welcome!

[1ec5]

Seems fine to me.

[matkoniecz]

Thanks for the PR! It is now merged but note that before you will see it in iD few things need to happen.

iD tagging schema needs to get release (see https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/releases - latest one mentioned there is just a draft). And later needs to be pulled in by iD.

Thanks again for your contribution! If you are interested in making other one it would be really welcome!