Conversation
Contributor
|
According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 |
JukkaL
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2023
Collaborator
JukkaL
left a comment
JukkaL
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the fix! Looks good.
Member
|
@sobolevn nice! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The change is quite simple: instead of manually unpacking the return type of
find_item, we use the regular machinery for it.Note, that this PR does not include any metaclasses related work. We still have problems with them, but I will defer them to the next PR.
Closes #14811
CC @AlexWaygood