QQ: fix consumer timeout bug (backport #15805)#15824
Merged
michaelklishin merged 1 commit intov4.3.xfrom Mar 25, 2026
Merged
Conversation
where an infinity timer would be emitted for the same command but after an actual timer leader to no timer. Move to a model where consumer timers are handled by the aux handler after each eval batch to reduce the number of timers emitted. (cherry picked from commit 99f16a0)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
where an infinity timer would be emitted for the same command
but after an actual timer leader to no timer.
Move to a model where consumer timers are handled by the aux
handler after each eval batch to reduce the number of timers
emitted.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #15805 done by Mergify.