Devfile Registry editor is to allow devfile version selection and use…#4467
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4467 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 32.37% 43.51% +11.13%
===========================================
Files 85 98 +13
Lines 6505 8002 +1497
Branches 1349 1702 +353
===========================================
+ Hits 2106 3482 +1376
- Misses 4399 4520 +121 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
29ea326 to
2e80f02
Compare
ce00ceb to
5e119c3
Compare
5e119c3 to
e5a6879
Compare
e5a6879 to
a880bac
Compare
|
adding new Devfile registries doesn't seem to work. I tried to add http://registry.stage.devfile.io , and nothing happened: no warnings and it didn't appear in the "Devfile Registries" section of the sidebar |
Try refreshing the Devfile Registry View tree - that is a known issue I fixed in #4473. |
|
Refreshing didn't work for me. That other PR says that it depends on this one in order to work - is that still the case? Is it possible to move the fix to this PR? |
I could try implementing the fix in this PR... the problem is that it'll need to make even more changes in depending #4473 due to conflicts (as it changes the same code) |
|
Should I focus on reviewing the other PR then? |
Adding/removing devfile registries are not the part of this PR.... With this one you can focus on the following goals:
The #4473 - is exactly about devfile registry tree, adding/changing/removing registries, refreshing the tree and the cache maintenance and getting rid of |
53207f5 to
0ed199c
Compare
0ed199c to
ab6662e
Compare
… when creating a component redhat-developer#4189 Fixes: redhat-developer#4189 Issue: redhat-developer#3850 Signed-off-by: Victor Rubezhny <[email protected]>
ab6662e to
670fabd
Compare
datho7561
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! Thanks, Victor! Thanks for your patience during the review.
… when creating a component #4189
Fixes: #4189
Issue: #3850