-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Feature/con 188 #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Feature/con 188 #18
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e2bc8f3
CON-188: Added docs + tests
samuelraeburn 30eae97
CON-188: Revert changes to package.json
samuelraeburn 0891c10
CON-188: Change of functionality
samuelraeburn 63e7072
CON-188: Remove debug
samuelraeburn 8db8abb
CON-188: PR feedback
samuelraeburn a6f7145
CON-188: PR Feedback
samuelraeburn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is the error captured and rethrown only to log a message? Just let it fail without a try/catch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can't do that, the test will not fail, the test will pass but mocha will detect
UnhandledPromiseRejectionthrown.This message would be printed to stdout:
So it sounds like in future versions of Node.js they will make it fail the process, but at the moment that is not the case.
The common solution online is to return the promise to mocha (which has promise handling, and can therefore detect the failure). But since our tests usually have multiple Promises within them (i.e., multiple
awaitcalls) I had thought that this wasn't an option. but it looks like I might have been wrong:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42493113/async-mocha-test-with-chai-assertion-library-should-fail-but-is-marked-as-pas
I'm not sure how that works, but it looks like you can do something like:
If you like I can investigate this option